federal prosecutor positions in the northern and eastern U.S. districts of Oklahoma to handle the increased caseloads." The Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that "either the federal government or the tribal nation has jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Native Americans, not the

federal prosecutor positions in the northern and eastern U.S. districts of Oklahoma to handle the increased caseloads." The Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that "either the federal government or the tribal nation has jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Native Americans, not the

federal prosecutor positions in the northern and eastern U.S. districts of Oklahoma to handle the increased caseloads." The Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that "either the federal government or the tribal nation has jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Native Americans, not the

e Cherokee Nation. 'The United States Attorney's Office is pursuing this case consistent with our new responsibilities following the Supreme Court's McGirt decision,' said U.S. Attorney Trent Shores. 'The cooperation among tribal, local, state and federal law enforcement is as strong as ever in northea

ould reshape the criminal-justice system by preventing state authorities from prosecuting offenses there that involve Native Americans." The case is McGirt v. Oklahoma. McGirt, the Washington Examiner (7/9, Dibble, 448K) recounts, is "a member of the Muscogee Nation who was convicted of raping a 4-year

federal prosecutor positions in the northern and eastern U.S. districts of Oklahoma to handle the increased caseloads." The Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma that "either the federal government or the tribal nation has jurisdiction over crimes committed by or against Native Americans, not the