ctually ensued, so long as it can be fairly said that the document was prepared or obtained because of the prospect of litigation. See Kent Corp. g N.L.R.B., 530 F.2d 612,623 (5th Cir. 1976) (holding that agency documents produced when deciding "to prosecute or not to prosecute" were protected work prod

le interpretation, though it may not be expanded beyond the meaning of its terms absent notice and an opportunity to be heard." Georgia Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 484 F.3d 1288, 1291 (11th Cir. 2007). Moreover, any ambiguities or uncertainties in such a court order must be construed in a light favorable to t