prosecution \1r. Ipstein IN 2114 %%on-anti:11 vn:- lowever. iii contradiction to Mr. Slinnan s assertion that C.D.'S hail provickd an independent. Sc' now/ review. CEOS made clear that it did not tin so. indeed. ( .1-USde.:littert to examine several of the more troublint" aspect". of the investi.4"ition