scope of what constitutes "matters occurring before the grand jury" is not as narrow as petitioners contend. Petitioners rely upon United States v. Ignasiak, F.3d , 2012 WL 149314 (11th Cir. Jan. 19, 2012), and Romero v. Drummond Co., Inc., 480 F.3d 1234 (111h Cir. 2007). D.E. 150 at 2-3. Neither of t

., Inc., 480 F.3d 1234 (111h Cir. 2007). D.E. 150 at 2-3. Neither of these cases involve the sealing of matters occurring before the grand jury. In Ignasiak, the government filed under seal, a post-trial in camera notice to the court, containing impeachment information about Dr. Arthur Jordan, a key witn

documents was not predicated in any way on the concept of grand jury secrecy. The common law right of access to judicial proceedings, recognized in Ignasiak and Romero v. Drummond, does not apply in the instant case because grand jury secrecy is the basis for sealing the three documents referenced in pe