ant behavior, Bell, J. dissenting op. at 54-56. We certainly agree that the bill title may be helpful in determining legislative intent. See, e.g., Aramark Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc. v. Easton, 894 So. 2d 20, 25 (Fla. 2004) (quoting State v. Webb, 398 So. 2d 820, 824-25 (Fla. 1981)). We disagree, however, that in this case the b