ly "too broad to require the conclusion that it encompasses [mail] fraud in particular" as required for grouping under § 3D1.2(c). United States v. Vucko, 473 F.3d 773, 779 (7th Cir. 2007)• see also United States v. Peterson, 312 F.3d 1300, 1302-04 (10th Cir. 2002) (holding that "the specific offense

s four counts of conviction together under § 3D1.2(c) is improper. See Vucko 473 F.3d at 779 (declining to group tax count with fraud count because "Vucko committed two different crimes, 4 EFTA00731338 Case 0:07-cr-60209-WPD Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/07/2007 Page 5 of 7 causing two dif