t the Martin Act does not preempt a common law claim where the claim "is not entirely dependent on the Martin Act for its viability." Assured Guar. (UK) Ltd. v. J.P.Morgan Inv. Management Inc., 18 N.Y.3d 341 (2011). The Court distinguished two of its prior decisions that discussed Martin Act preemption a

f motions to disqualify counsel, and they now approach them with cautious scrutiny." Laker Ainvays Ltd., 103 F.R.D. at 28. See also Ragdoll Prods. (UK) Ltd. v. Wal—Mart Stores, Inc., No. 99 CV 2101, 1999 WL 760209, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 1999) (holding that motions to disqualify are "subject to stric

d. 2.36 "Indenture' means that certain Indenture dated as of May 2. 2006 by and among the Issuer, Ambac Assurance UK Limited and Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. as financial guarantors, The Bank of New York (acting through its London Branch) as trustee, The Bank of New York as auction agent and The Bank of

d. 2.36 "Indenture" means that certain Indenture dated as of May 2, 2006 by and among the Issuer, Ambac Assurance UK Limited and Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. as financial guarantors, The Bank of New York (acting through its London Branch) as trustee, The Bank of New York as auction agent and The Bank of

. 2.36 "Indenture" means that certain Indenture dated as of May 2, 2006 by and among the Issuer, Ambac Assurance UK Limited and Assured Guaranty (UK) Ltd. as financial guarantors, The Bank of New York (acting through its London Branch) as trustee, The Bank of New York as auction agent and The Bank o