believe we participated in an interagency meeting for that project. The project was submitted to CZM and COE but never completed the project as Mr. Kjear decided not to pursue the project and no further work was done in regard to that development. The new applicant also is not associated with the doc

ser I assumed that that damage was probably associated with bringing supplies to work on the cottages. The new owner Great St. Jim, LLC was told by Kjear's representative that all permits were in order. And the applicant does have a CZM permit in good standing on the dock in its current configuration

amarie and their legal council, Erika and myself and negotiate a path forward. Johann is adamant we cant be held responsible or be punished for what Kjear did or didn't do correctly. What I am proposing is that we be allowed up this dock with a promise that we will have a permit application in for a ne

marie and their legal council, Erika and myse=f and negotiate a path forward. Johann is adamant we cant be held res=onsible or be punished for what Kjear did or didn't do correctly. What I am proposing is that we b= allowed up this dock with a promise that we will have a permit application=in for a n

amarie and their legal council, Erika a=d myself and negotiate a path forward. Johann is adamant we cant be =eld responsible or be punished for what Kjear did or didn't do co=rectly. </=iv> What I am propos=ng is that we be allowed up this dock with a promise that we will have a p=rmit application in