y is no longer intended or as a waiver of the privilege." In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir. 1973) (citing MCCORMACK, EVIDENCE § 93, at 197 (Cleary ed. 1972) and cases cited therein and 8 WIGMORE, EVIDENCE § 2311, at 599 (McNaughton rev. 1961)). Thus, a person cannot invoke a "privilege as to commu

n the first instance on the individual asserting the privilege to demonstrate an attorney-client relationship. C. McCormick Evidence, s 88, p. 179 (Cleary ed. 1972). The privilege does not apply to all communications between attorney and client. For example, where a client shared confidential communicati