e government would give rise to any such disparity. In a recent case, the Ninth Circuit specifically rejected this argument, in which the defendant, Treadwell, argued for a more lenient sentence based upon the sentences previously imposed against some of the same defendants identified in Exhibit G to the

ct that Treadwell can point to a defendant convicted at a different time of a different fraud and sentenced to a term of imprisonment shorter than Treadwell's does not create an "unwarranted" sentencing disparity. A district court need not, and, as a practical matter, cannot compare a proposed sentence