e., she states in no uncertain terms (DE 354, p.3) that she seeks information that the Federal government gave to Epstein. However, in her Reply to the Response in Opposition, she now seeks everything that the government gave to Epstein's lawyers and what his lawyers gave to the Federal government (i.e., the full breadth

FTA00727456 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 104 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 3 of 4 I C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 3 outlined in the Response in Opposition to file brief as Amicus Curiae, as well as the facts set forth in this motion, the Court should deny the motion to file sur-reply. WHEREFORE, Defen