ros. & Co. v. CIGNA Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1397 (E.D.Pa. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Ne. Women's Or., Inc. v. McMonagle, 689 F. Supp. 465 (E.D. Pa. 1988), aff'd in relevant part, 868 F.2d 1342 (3d Cir. 1989). The decision to grant a new trial lies within the discretio

ndant's "dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." (Emphasis added) See, e.g., Trovarello v. McMonagle, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18529, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 16, 1998) ("Once the sufficiency of service of process is challenged, the party on whose service