A single witness in an alternative forum is not a basis to dismiss a case under forum non conveniens. In re Seatrain Lines, Inc., 32 B.R. 669, 671 (Bkrtcy.N.Y. 1983). Additionally, "the location of documents, records and photographs has become a less significant factor in forum non conveniens analysis

with money directly traceable to embezzled funds and where there was no consideration for the receipt of those funds. See In Re Mart, 106 B.R.309 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Fla. 5 EFTA00725359 1989) . 6 EFTA00725360

court, procedural rules are controlled by New York law. 8] Davis, 138 A.D.3d at 238. 9] See e.g., In re Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Sea. LW, 458 BR 87 (Bkrtcy S.D.N.Y. 2011). 101 Kirschner, 15 N.Y.3d at 467. 11) Lehr, 2016 WL 164616 at M. 12]See Stokoe v. Marcum & Kliegman LLP, 135 A.D.3d 645 (1st Dept.