condition had a value which could not be known, thereby making the proposal invalid. 7 EFTA00597560 Similarly, Judge Griffin noted in Dryden v. Pedemonti, 910 So.2d 854, 857 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (specially concurring), that the inclusion of such non-monetary terms with monetary value thwarted the calc

8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 of the confidentiality provision itsolf was all or part of the $300,000. The Fifth DCA in the case of Dryden versus Pedemonti, P-e-d-e-m-o-n-t-i -- and I'm not referencing the page and line citations; they're included in our memo, your Honor -- the Fifth DCA noted, again