iciently clear and definite to allow the offeree to make an informed decision without needing clarification" (932 So.2d at 1079). 5 EFTA00597558 Swartsel's discussion of the importance of including confidentiality terms has never been disagreed with by any appellate court. Indeed, in Nichols, while th

tlement funds? The inclusion of these terms was critical to Edwards' ability to make an informed decision of acceptance or rejection. One aspect of Swartsel was disagreed with by the Supreme Court in Nichols. In Swartsel, the Fourth District held parties were required to specify all terms of a settlemen