multiple and irreconcilable interpretations," 946 So. 2d at 1157-58, we apply the rule of lenity. We therefore quash the decision below and approve the Second District's decision in Taylor. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY The facts on which the underlying convictions are based are explained in the district court's

tter what remedy he seeks, he should not be entitled to enforce the rule under the circumstances of this case. Epstein relies almost exclusively on the Second District's decision in Gawker Media, LLC v. Baal, 170 So.3d 125, 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); which is distinguishable. In Gawker, the plaintiff brought suit again