r an inspection of the massage table and massage room, respectively, because the inspection could lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. See Welzel v. Bernstein, 233 F.R.D. 185, 186 (D.C. 2005) (noting that in cases in which a site inspection has been allowed, the rationale has been because the

imited it to one-hour and to the suite of offices at issue. 54. While has not and cannot demonstrate a need for inspection like the plaintiff in Welzel (i.e. that the configuration of the office itself exacerbated her emotional distress), if the Court permits an inspection of Epstein's residence, it