egarding his financial status and his counsel. Accordingly, disqualification is required. See also Ginsberg v. Holt, 86 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 1956); Olszewska v. Ferro, 590 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991). CONCLUSION Accordingly, based upon the aforementioned facts and the case law delineated herein, EFTA0