d is timely made, it should be granted." Borjas v. Brescher, 579 So. 2d 399, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (citing Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So. 2d 240, 242 (Fla.1986)). A trial court, when presented with a motion to disqualify, must limit its review of the motion to a "bare determination of legal sufficiency." B

ndard language in a general release that should be considered unambiguous and should not invalidate the proposal. See Sheen v. Lyon, 485 So.2d 422 (Fla.1986). In Sheen, the Florida Supreme Court held that a general release discharging a specifically named employer and its agents and employees was clear