urt require more evidence as to the role of Jeanne Brenna, an 9 EFTA00792297 evidentiary hearing where the process server testifies is an option. Linville v.Home Say. Of America, FSB,at 296. III. F.S. 48.031(11(a) does not explicitly require an averment on the return of service that the person serve

a. 5th DCA 2014) 8 Delaney v. Tobias, 10 26 So.3d 77, 80 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2010) Hull v. Lending House, Inc., 10 19 So.3d 404 (Fla. 3'd DCA 2009) Linville v.Home Say. Of America, FSB, 10 629 So.2d 295,296 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1993) Snowden v. Wells Fargo Bank, 8 172 So.3d 506, 507 (Fla. 1s' DCA 2015) Flo

hearing for "clearing anything up" is unpreserved and for that reason must be rejected as well. See Issue II, infra. Third, Plaintiffs' reliance on Linville is entirely misplaced. Linville involved the denial of a motion to quash service of process and the denial of the improperly-served individual's re

edly ask for an evidentiary hearing to "clear up any issues as to the number of attempts to serve Epstein himself at his place of business," citing Linville v. Home Say. of America, FSB, 629 So. 2d 295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). First, this request is itself a concession that Plaintiffs failed to establish pro

. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6). 523-534. Linville. P. W., & Fischer, G. \V. (1991). Preferences for separating or combining events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 60(1). 5-23. Loewe