*140 the like.g,s c d In re Sealed Case No. 99-3091, 192 F.3d 995, 1001 (D.C.Cir.1999) (quoting In re Motions of Dow Jones & Co., 142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C.Cir.1998)). [4][5] The applicants contend that the %,most likelyc implication of identifying the carve out employees as not covered by the grant of immunity

ified during Grand Jury proceedings are subject to the secrecy provisions of F.R.Crim.P 6(e), see eg In re Dow Jones & Co.. Inc.,142 F.3d 496, 500 (D.C.Cir.1998) ("Consistent with these purposes, we have recognized that grand jury secrecy covers 'the identities of witnesses or jurors, the substance of testi