"a party cannot hide behind the shield of privilege to prevent an opponent from effectively challenging pertinent evidence." Caries Constr. Inc. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am., 56 F. Supp. 3d 1259, 1273 n.40 (S.D. Fla. 2014) (emphasis added). As such, "waiver of the attorney-client privilege under Flori

pport thereof, plaintiffs have not carried their burden under Rule 56(c) and, therefore, defendant is entitled to summary judgment on these claims. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. J.O.A. Const. Co., Inc., 479 Fed. Appx. 684, 692 (6th Cir. 2012) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2)-(3)). Accordingly, defendant