ual who had acquired French nationality after committing an offence, which is the natural use of this provision (for example, a ruling issued by the Criminal Chamber of the French Cow de caseation on 4 January 2006, n°05-86.258). 21. Although we have found no precedent where French authorities were faced with th

triction. 38.The source tells in addition that, by judgment of 19 August 2014, the joint chambers of the Supreme Court annulled the judgment of the Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court dated 6 February 2014, thus granting the motion filed by the Attorney General on 6 June 2014 for this purpose. 39.Finally, a

ual who had acquired French nationality after committing an offence, which is the natural use of this provision (for example, a ruling issued by the Criminal Chamber of the French Cour de cassation on 4 January 2006, n°05-86.258). 21. Although we have found no precedent where French authorities were faced with t