d in his way." A.Q.C. ex rel. Castillo v. United States, 656 F.3d 135, 144 (2d Cir. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Feliciano v. U.S. Bank N.A., No. 13-CV-5555, 2014 WL 2945798, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 2014) (same). The Second Circuit has explained that the type of situation -9- EFTA00802

rocess for determining the proper interest rate under the cramdown provision of Chapter 11. We decline to dismiss these appeals as equitably moot. U.S. Bank N.A. v. Wilmington Say. Fund Soc'y (In re MPM Silicones, LLC), 531 B.R. 321, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66420 (S.D.N.Y., May 4, 2015) CASE SUMMARY: OVERVIEW