0, 2000. On appeal, Donnan contends that: (1) because the matter arises from a real estate dispute, the district court lacks jurisdiction; (2) the Injunction unlawfully prohibits constitutionally protected activity; (3) the district court erred when it denied Donnan's Objections to Video Document and Ob

n of the Merger be pending. In the event an Injunction shall have been issued, each party agrees to use its reasonable diligent efforts to have the Injunction lifted. (d) STATUTES. No statute, rule or regulation shall have been enacted by any court or governmental authority of competent jurisdiction which

ion 167 of the DM requiring your removal of the offending statements and to refrain from making the same. or similar, statements in the future. The Injunction would also prevent you front otherwise harassing our client and she would be entitled to an order requiring you to publish any judgment finding tha