rom beginning because she did not believe that the tenants of the Program were favorable to the victims. We worked together with both the Estate and the USVI AG over the past few months to improve the Program so that the AG would allow the Program to move forward. As you know, an agreement has been reached a

) wrote: Hi Following up on this, we spoke with counsel to the USVI in October and raised these concerns. The attorney said she would consult with the USVI AG and get back to us. She did not get back to us, and we've learned today that the USVI has been issuing a number of subpoenas to individuals—includin

rom beginning because she did not believe that the tenants of the Program were favorable to the victims. We worked together with both the Estate and the USVI AG over the past few months to improve the Program so that the AG would allow the Program to move forward. As you know, an agreement has been reached

rom beginning because she did not believe that the tenants of the Program were favorable to the victims. We worked together with both the Estate and the USVI AG over the past few months to improve the Program so that the AG would allow the Program to move forward. As you know, an agreement has been reached a

ecause she did not believe that the tenants of the Program were favorable to the victims. We EFTA01651116 worked together with both the Estate and the USVI AG over the past few months to improve the Program so that the AG would allow the Program to move forward. As you know, an agreement has been reached a