uding damages or restitution, courts can set off the amounts paid to class members against any recovery by the state attorneys general. See EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279, 295a96 (2002) (EEOC could not obtain double recovery based on prior settlement and acknowledging prior private settlement amounts wou

710 F.2d 752, 762 (11th Cir.1983). The plaintiff must be the target against which anticompetitive activity is directed. Midwestern Waffles, Inc. v. Waffle House, Inc., 734 F.2d 705, 710 (11th Cir.1984); Pan-Islamic Trade Corp. v. Exxon Corp., 632 F.2d 539, 546-47 (5th Cir.1980), ("17] cert. denied, 454 U.S. 927,

is Judgment until the date of payment; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall close this matter. S' CURTIS V. GOMEZ Chief Judge Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279, 297 (2002) ("[I]t `goes without saying that the courts can and should preclude double recovery by an individual.'" (quoting General