the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight.' English, 629 F.3d at 319 (quoting Mercedes, 254 F.3d at 436); see also United States v. Mardi., 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986) ("The government retains the burden of persuasion [in a presumption case]."). Even when "a defendant has met h

of mutual hod to our rents we rotor our affiliate receive revered:wig paments ban dist tutors ands advisors of the marl tut that we sell. These !Mardi We based on two different comprente (0 to arose of sales by LISS of a particular (*Owl krd f amity to ourclents and GO fie asset rake of a parlour