14-cr-00018-O-BL Document 105 Filed 04/30/15 Page 8 of 12 Pagel D 429 No. 14-11080 have been obvious to a reasonable person." See United States u. Maestas, 642 F.3d 1315, 1321 (10th Cir. 2011) (reasoning that "recklessness is generally an objective standard" and that "a defendant's conduct involves a

conscious" and "reckless" meaningless, which is nonsensical in light of the Section's disjunctive phrasing, i.e., "conscious or reckless risk." See Maestas, 642 F.3d at 1321; Johanson, 249 F.3d at 858; Lucien, 347 F.3d at 56. The facts of this case, however, do not require that we decide today whether