orm[s] the judicial function' ... when it rules on motions currently before it." Brown, 929 F.3d at 49 (emphasis supplied; footnote omitted; quoting Arnodeo I, 44 F.3d at 145). And it was building on Amodeo I when it said, "A document is thus `relevant to the performance of the judicial function' if it

in opposition to the Defendant's pre-trial motions is a "judicial document" for purposes of the first element of the Lugosch test. United States v. Arnodeo ("Arnodeo I"), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). The Court thus concludes that there is a common law and a First Amendment presumption of access. Id