ird Circuit's focus was "`on the technical question of whether a document is physically on file with the court."' Amodeo I, 44 F.3d at 145 (quoting Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 782 (3d Cir. 1994)). In that circuit if a document is filed with a court, it is a judicial document; otherwi

F.3d 772, 782 (3d Cir. 1994)). In that circuit if a document is filed with a court, it is a judicial document; otherwise it is not. See id. (citing Pansy, 23 F.3d at 782). The Amodeo I court cited two other Third Circuit cases confirming that circuit's litmus-test approach to identifying judicial doc

e advertising mini-dachsunds for sale and inquired about one of them, 'Pansy.' On March 11, she received a text from 'Hector Cantu' indicating that Pansy was still available for $600." The woman "ended up sending $9,100 in wire payments through Western Union," and "the whole thing was a fraud perpetra

e advertising mini-dachsunds for sale and inquired about one of them, 'Pansy.' On March 11, she received a text from 'Hector Cantu' indicating that Pansy was still available for $600." The woman "ended up sending $9,100 in wire payments through Western Union," and "the whole thing was a fraud perpetra

te advertising mini-dachsunds for sale and inquired about one of them, `Pansy: On March 11, she received a text from `Hector Cantu' indicating that Pansy was still available for $600." The woman "ended up sending $9,100 in wire payments through Western Union," and "the whole thing was a fraud perpetra