1
Total Mentions
1
Documents
0
Connected Entities
e conditions are satisfied. He is not entitled simply to accept the assertion of the applicant for the warrant.2 R v GuiUhall Magistrates Court ex p Primlaks Holdings (Panama) Limited (1990) 1 QB 261.272-3. 2 See R (Falk:hex LtdJ v Preston Crown Court 120091 1 WLR 1687: (Redknapp v Metropolitan Mire Commissioner120081 EWHC Mmin 1
Page: EFTA00022266 →No connected entities