de the defendant's right to a fair trial ....' ") (quoting with alterations United States a Doe, 63 F.3d 121, 128 (2d Cir. 1995)); United States v. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2014) ("A court's conclusion that a qualified First Amendment right of access to cer

ank AG, 377 F.3d 133, 144 (2d Cir. 2004), before the interested parties have an opportunity to seek review of the orders. See, e.g., United Staten. Martoma, No. Si 12 CR 973 PGG, 2014 WL 164181, at •8 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 9, 2014) ("The Court stays immediate disclosure of these materials to permit Defendant t

vise Matthew Martoma, which resulted in Mr. Cohen's firm engaging in insider trading. Further, it alleges that Cohen ignored several red flags that Martoma had access to inside information. EFTA00637561 Finally, the Order imposes some additional requirements on Mr. Cohen, including requiring his fam