3
Total Mentions
3
Documents
1
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
54 AM EST To: " )" Cc: "Chadwick, Amanda J (London EFTA00016027 --- PAGE BREAK --- Subject: FW: Extradition question Here is the feedback from the Crown Prosecution Service. As noted, a consent in the US would not be binding on a court in the UK. (I can pull the relevant Extradition Act provisions cited below) While I s
Page: EFTA00016028 →EFTA00078759
mple in United States v. Stanton, No. 91 CR 889 (CHS) 1992 WL 27139 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2002), the court observed: The government has been advised by the Crown Prosecution Service in Great Britain that citizens of countries other than European Community or British Commonwealth countries (for whom a streamlined procedure exist
EFTA00161693
t there are no substantial grounds to believe that Lynch's rights to medical care would be breached if he is sent to prison in the US. A lawyer for the Crown Prosecution Service, which has conducted the proceedings against Lynch on the DOJ's behalf, did not respond to a request for comment Counsel to Michael Lynch Matrix C