p that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public 59 Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range for the offences in the superseding indict

will not necessarily be fatal: R (Malik) v Manchester and Salford Magistrates' Coon (2017) EWHC 2901 (Admin). 2 R (Energy Financing Team limited) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (2006) 1 WLR 1316. para 24 at (4). (5) Privilege against self-incrimination in mutual azistanee proceedings Whilst a person giving evidence before