heme," provides "strong evidence that Congress did not intend to authorize other remedies that it simply forgot to incorporate expressly") (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) 10 EFTA00010551 --- PAGE BREAK --

coinsmane SCAAC0S INOduaS prodded by service provoar aeanst the say= provider and not ran Ainerteen Doe.* YOu Sr. reeptesible for easterner**. Mertens (eaves epee. lees you authentic We resent lie right to note von* and pre/wens° Ceti fa &Wang Purposes Your response is required to complete this re