helaw. Because bf the amount bf Jitne involved, in this litigation and con~idering the relative smalL sfae of the firn1 representing the State Att.Qrney, th;e µ11_dt;m11gned. at~orn,eys were: forced to mm 1_1way or delay representing other cli•ents espe:cia1ly duriQg critical stagGs· of thelitigatio