er or statute. Epstein’s Motion fails to discuss or even mention Rule 6(a). The only case authority cited by Defendant is an unpublished opinion, Cornelius v. Home Comings Financial Network, Inc., 293 Fed. Appx. 723, 2008 WL 4230197 (11th Cir. 2008). In Cornelius, the Court did not address the issue of

y Defendant is an unpublished opinion, Cornelius v. Home Comings Financial Network, Inc., 293 Fed. Appx. 723, 2008 WL 4230197 (11th Cir. 2008). In Cornelius, the Court did not address the issue of the calculation of the ten day appeal period under the Rules. Rather, the Court only found See Ad Vance

made within 10 days after being served with said order. Thus, weekends are included in the calculation and, as a result, Plaintiff is untimely. See Cornelius v. Home Comings Financial Network, 293 Fed.Appx. 723, 7282009 WL 4230197 (C.A.11 (Ga.))(granting motion to strike for failing to timely file respon