iding that parties may be dropped ‘in the manner provided for voluntary dismissal in rule 1.420(a)(1) subject to the exception stated in that rule.’” Siboni v. Allen, 52 So. 3d 779, 780 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). 17. Likewise, because Rule 1.250(b) specifies that a party is dropped “in the manner provided for v

ly under Rule l.420(a)(l). Id. at 781. 4 CA/[email protected] BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:10:49 PM 18. Accordingly, the Siboni court held that a “party dropped from litigation under rule 1.250(b) is subject to the time limitation contained in rule 1.525 governing service of a

tedentifelyuridetRtilel.420(a)(l). ld.at78L 4 CA/Aro-p~?~Ai~ BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/27/2023 4:20:48 PM 18. Accordingly, the Siboni court held that a “party dropped from litigation under rule 1.250(b) is subject to the time limitation contained in rule 1.525 governing- service of

10). 1'7 . Likewise, because Rule 1.250(b) specifies that a party is dropped “in the manner provided for voluntary dismissal in Rule 1.420(a)(1), the Siboni court concluded that “the manner” includes the same entitlement to costs and attorney’s fees which would have been enjoyed had the dismissal occurred