y to preserve all relevant evidence, regardless of whether he intends to raise his privilege against self-incrimination. See Capricorn Power Co. v. Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp., 220 F.R.D. 429, 434 (W.D. Pa. 2004) (A motion for a 10 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2009 Page 11 of 15

of admissible evidence. However, potential admissibility is not relevant to a preservation order, as the court recognized in Capricorn Power Co. v. Siemens Westinghouse Power Corp., 220 F.R.D. 429, 434 (W.D. Pa. 2004): “[A] motion for a preservation order can be granted with regard to all items of evidence which are discoverabl