ial proceedings} The press also has a First Amendme_nt interest in rec~iving information from willing speakers. See Va. State Bd of Pharmacy v. Va. Citizei1s Consumer Cotmcil, Irie., 425 U.S. 748, 756-57 (1976) ("Wh~re a speaker exists . . . the protection afforded [by the First Am~ndment] is to the communication, to its