permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 26”). See also Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, 111 (1st Cir. 2008); Monteiro v. San Nicolas, S.A., 254 F.2d 514, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1958) (holding that discovery was appropriate on disputed issues of service of process). The p

n=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjc18y&sig=278532409c7728b7fd97a9a18f066=158cadb7ed&iid=46e2b2f6263b 4c15abbe8215c2230921&uid=400687396&=mp;nid=244+125> =/td> Mi=e Monteiro <https://twitter.com/i/redirect?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwit=er.com%2Fmonteiro%3Fcn%3DZmxleGlibGVfcmVjc18y%26re fsrc%3Demail&t=l&a=p;cn=ZmxleGlibGVfcmVjc