uce documents with privileged information redacted and submit the un-redacted documents to the court for an in-camera inspection). EXHIBIT "A" 2. Methodist Hospitals, Inc. v. Sullivan, 91 F.3d 1026, 1031-32 (7th Cir. 1996) (holding that portions of brief containing confidential personal financial information should be

d a “Notice of Supplemental Authority” presenting two additional cases, only one of which merits discussion. In , 134 B.R. 679 (S.D. Fla. 1991). Methodist Hospitals, Inc. v. Sullivan 3 See footnote 2 above. , 91 F.3d Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 525 E

c. v. Nestle, S.A., 2008 WL 3200702 (D. Puerto Rico 2008) (acknowledging that parties can file certain privileged information in a redacted format); Methodist Hospitals, Inc. v. Sullivan, 91 F.3d 1026 (7 Cir. 1996) (allowing redaction of th physician salaries from brief as “gratuitous” rather than seal entire memorandum).