ordingly, Alfredo Rodriguez has, at the very least, a right to possession of the documents that are the subject of the Plaintiff’s subpoena. Searock v. Stripling, 736 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1984). Rodriguez has this right to obtain the subpoenaed documents under Bagley or in the normal course of di

al discovery rules includes not only documents in the non-party’s possession, but also “the legal right to obtain the documents requested on demand.” Searock v. Stripling, 736 F.2d 650 (11 Cir. th 1984). Inasmuch as Rodriguez has the right to obtain the subpoenaed documents under Bagley or in the normal