Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

Chase, not J.P. Morgan 8 Chase. So we had to reissue another subpoena, which was 9 taken care of on March 22, '07. 10 We also issued 0LY-40 on Chase Bank as well on 11 12 April 4, 2007. We received records on April 13, 2007 and April 19, 2007 to cover all three subpoenas that were 13 served. 14

request is not ambiguous or lacking in precision? 1 CfR vSeeretary ofStatefor the Home Department ex p Fininvert Spa [1997) I WLR 743, 751/PA/organ Chase Bank National ALCOCiatiOft V Director of the Serious Fraud Office 12012) Lloyd's Rep FC 655. pan 29. Concerns were expressed during the debates on the C