otification” letters in to in’s alleged victims saying “(t)his case is currently under investigation.” However, the office had signed the agreement COVINGTON ittorneys want a court hearing during which they will ask that the agreement be invalidated because it violated the COVINGTON & BURLING LLP =zpstei

COVINGTON NEW NO RUSE ONE TO ANE HANGHAI SILICON VALLEY WASHINGTOI Robert K. Kelner Covington & Burling LLI One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street, NW Washington, DC2

e7423648e71> Opinion Nothing justifies what the Covington students did <https://s2.washingtonpost.com/f87bc

aw360 Pro Say Podcast Listen to our new podcast here LAW FIRMS Arnold & Itkin Baker McKenzie Boies Schiller Carlton Fields Cosgrove Eisenberg Covington & Burling Dechert DiMuroGinsberg PC Flachsbart & Greenspoon Gibson Dunn Hogan Lovells Holland & Knight Jackson Lewis K&L Gates Kirkland & El

t of the privilege bears the burden to establish its existence, United States v. (Under Seal), 748 F.2d 871, 876 (4th Cir.I 984); United States v. Covington & Burling, 430 F.Supp. 1117, 1122 (D.D.C.I 977), and absent the timely assertion of attorney-client privilege for each specific communication or d