: Follow up Importance: — High Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kathy Ruemm|cr oT Date: February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST To: "Immelt, Stephen J." [as Subject: Re: Follow up Hi Steve, I am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to

To: Jeffrey [[email protected]] Subject: Fwd: Follow up Importance: — High Unsatisfactory Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Immelt, Stephen J." < Date: February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST To: "Kathy Ruemmler™ < Subject: RE: Follow up Kathy We will of course do this in whateve

, Kathy Ruemmler TE > wrote: Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Kathy Ruemmlcr {a — Date: February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST To: "Immelt, Stephen J." Subject: Re: Follow up Hi Steve, I am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have

acceptable conditions On Saturday, 27 February 2016, Kathy Ruemmler (> wrote: Unsatisfactory Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Immelt, Stephen J." as Date: February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST To: "Kathy Ruemmler" Subject: RE: Follow up Kathy We will of course do this in whateve

: Saturday, February 27, 2016 7:21 PM To: Jeffrey Subject: Fwd: Follow up Unsatisfactory Sent from m= iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Immelt, Stephen J." D=te: February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST To: "'Kathy Ruemmler=" Subject: RE: Follow up Kathy We w=ll of course do this in whateve

Fwd: Follow up Sent from my Phone =br>Begin forwarded message: =rom: Kathy Ruemmler <mailto > Date: February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM M=T To: "Immelt, Stephen J." < <mailt Subject: <=>Re: Follow up Hi Steve, I am still intrigued and w=uld like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, fo

&g=; wrote: the =irl who kills her parents and then wants sympathy that she is an orphan On Mon, Ma= 7, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Kathy Ruemmler sO wrote: Immelt emailed that he wo=ld get back to me later this week. Moved the meeting with Henri to T=ursday, but will have to take red-eye back from SF on Wednes

after On Th=rsday, 25 February 2016, Kathy Ruemmler <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: Sent from my iP=one Begin forwarded message: From: "Immelt, Stephen J." < Date: February 25, 2016 at 6:23:16=AM CST To: ' Subject: Follow up Kathy =/span> I don't want to pester you, but in the hope tha

t from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: target="_blank" &g=; From: Kathy Ruemmler <=a href="mailto Date: February 27, 2016 at 8:07:42 AM MST "Immelt, Stephen J." < <mailto Subject: Re: Follow up Hi Steve, l=am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes=sense, though, for

jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 08:50 PM To: Karp, Brad S Subject: Re: things for you to think about. Immelt made a pitch re the future - all major litigation will be global in scope. International regulators and regulation. He said he would build a dept ar

girl who kills her parents and then=wants sympathy that she is an orphan On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Kathy Ruemmler <=pan dir="ltr" > wrote: Immelt emailed that he would get back to me later this week. M=ved the meeting with Henri to Thursday, but will have to take red-eye back f=om SF on Wednes

, so that the only choice was to give me $= m or $1.5 m, but they could not give anything in between. Re: toni=e, Neal said that I should just tell Immelt what I want. Sent=from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2016, at 7:53 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: I think we should=war game out tonites dinn

e type="cite"> the girl who kills her paren=s and then wants sympathy that she is an orphan On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Kath= Ruemmler wrote: Immelt emailed that he would get back to me later this w=ek. Moved the meeting with Henri to Thursday, but will have to take r=d-eye back from SF on Wednes

om: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 1:23 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Fwd: Call? And there you go. Forwarded message Fr=m: Immelt, Stephen J. Date: Friday, March 11= 2016 Subject: Call? To: Kathy Ruemmler • 1 > > To preview, my thinking is 6, but it woul= be useful to walk t

Summers <M I Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 8:44 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: What happened to mnuchin? James? Romney too controversial? Immelt is hard right. Good operator es=ablishment. Needs a next thing. Not smart. U r not serious re me. Y can't the guy do easy thinks like not send=ng s

ct: Re: hes a dope On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Lar Summers <mailto > wrote: What happened to mnuchin? lames? Romney too controversia=? Immelt is hard right. Good operator establishment. Needs a next thing. Not smart. U r not serious re me. Y can't the guy do =asy thinks like not sending

ow? R =hey open to democrats? To=y James? La=ry Fink? Fr=d Smith Pe=er Thiel EFTA_R1_01922229 EFTA02669499 We=e they serious re Jamie? Je=f Immelt Sent from my iPad <mailto Please direct all=scheduling inquiries to my office at Follow me on twit=er On Nov 27, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Jeffrey E.