t Bannon “could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.” Many thought that the reign of the “Dark Lord” had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon’s adversa

t Bannon “could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.” Many thought that the reign of the “Dark Lord” had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon’s adversa

t Bannon “could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.” Many thought that the reign of the “Dark Lord” had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon’s adversa

t Bannon “could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.” Many thought that the reign of the “Dark Lord” had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon’s adversa

t Bannon “could give the fragmented right in Europe a common ideology and rhetoric.” Many thought that the reign of the “Dark Lord” had ended, writes Gernot Kramper, when Steve Bannon left first the White House and then his role as executive chairman of Breitbart News. It turns out, however, that Bannon’s adversa