he credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While probably not impt on a "substantive" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely

he credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While probably not impt on a "substantive" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely

the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, =f course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees =s reviewing apol and apo-o1. While probably not impt on a "substantive" ba=is it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely

cation of effort. Once we have given this information to the Trustees together with the structure documents Alan is preparing, they will likely ask Irene Steiner at Akin Gump to review it on behalf of the Trustees. EFTA_R1_02207536 EFTA02722554 Heather-please chime in if I have left something out. Thanks!

the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, =f course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees =s reviewing apol and apo-o1. While probably not impt on a "substantive" ba=is it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely

the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While probably not impt on a "substantive" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely

the credit line, but don't borrow any $$. (We can, of course push closing back but my preference wld be to close.) 2. Right now, at barry's request, Irene Steiner, on behalf of the trustees is reviewing apol and apo-ol. While probably not impt on a "substantive" basis it was (a) impt to barry and (b) is likely