ECF No. 373 and ECF No. 549; Aguilar, 783 F. Supp. 2d at 1115. 21 Criminal Information, United States v. C.E. Millier Corp., et al., No. 82-cr-788 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 1982), available at http://www. justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/cases/ce-miller/ 1982-09-17-ce-miller- information. pdf. 22 See Complaint,

.D. Va. July 30, 2009), ECF No. 684 [hereinafter United States v. Jefferson] (same); Jury Instructions at 8-10, United States v. Green, No. 08-cr-59 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 11, 2009), ECF No. 288 [hereinafter United States v. Green| (same); Jury Instructions at 23-29, United States v. Bourke, No. 05-cr-518 (S.D.NY.

nowledge by any member of a law firm is imputed to all attorneys in the firm. See,'.,& In re Mortgage & Realty Trust, 195 B.R. 740, 754-55 (Bankr., C.D. Cal. 1996) (noting that the imputed knowledge theory holds that knowledge by any member of a law firm is knowledge by all of the attorneys in the firm, p

. Fla. 2007) (noting role of Attorneys General in class settlement approval process); True v. American Honda Motor Co., 749 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 1082 (C.D. Cal. 2010) (discussing views of state Attorneys General with respect to class action settlement grounded in products liability claims). Since the passage

t guidelines tested by adversarial process and pit-trial discovery." Id. citing Chi v. Univ. of S. Cal., No. 2:18-cv-04258, 2019 WL 3064457, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2019) (holding that, in a sexual abuse class action, "the contemplated authority of the" non-judicial officer "to make all claims determina